Can Congress Free Itself from Party Interference?


, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

For any attempt to free American government from petrifying  partisanship that grips it now, by far the most difficult task will be to free Congress from the two-party system to which we have grown so accustomed over more than two centuries that we find it difficult to imagine our government without it.  Yet it is not the form of government described in the Constitution.


George Washington warned us against partisanship in his Farewell Address in 1796:

“However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.”

Today, the parties have burrowed, like parasitic worms, deep into the very flesh of our government, where they battle each other for supremacy, to the vast detriment of the country.  The Declaration of Independence rightly tells us that “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”  Many today feel, with considerable justification, that their consent doesn’t count for much, or that the decisions made by partisan politicians in Washington reflect their oppression rather than empowerment.

Ironically, Washington’s Farewell Speech is recited by rote at the opening of every Congress, though few members remain in the chamber for this rite.

How, then, do we recover the apartisan government that the founders envisioned?  Has the American Experiment in democracy failed forever?  Is it already too late?

*  Presiding over the Senate *

McConnellThe two-party system has taken control of the levers of power in the Senate.  The majority leader (presently Mitch McConnell), who is selected by a vote among members of the majority party only, dictates which bills reach a floor vote and which wither and die.  The idea of supermajority, and its daughter the filibuster, which the founders conceived as ways to foster debate and promote compromise, have been largely abandoned because they can be used to thwart the power of a party that controls only a simple majority in the chamber.

In an apartisan Senate there would be no majority party caucus to elect a leader.  The constitution assigns the role of presiding over the Senate to the Vice President, although he has no vote on the floor except in the event of a tie.  Article 1 also directs the Senate to elect from their number a President pro tempore to oversee the Senate in the absence of the Vice President, or in the rare instance that he is exercising the office of a President who has become incapacitated, died, or been removed from office by impeachment or resignation.

running mates2

Running Mates

To mitigate the possibility of collusion between the President and Vice President to control the Senate, Amendment XII requires that the Vice President and President be elected on “distinct ballots” of the Electoral College.  Inconvenient in this age of partisan politics, this requirement has been bypassed in a system which allows each party to nominate a “ticket” for both offices, creating “running mates” and ensuring that one party holds both offices.

In an apartisan Senate, this forced cozy relationship between the President and Senate leadership should be eliminated.  Distinct ballots for President and Vice President, as well as the election of President pro tem from the floor rather than a party caucus, would help to restore to the voters in nationwide elections some discretion as to how bills and appointments are managed as they navigate toward the Senate floor.

These changes in procedure would bring the workings  of the Senate closer to the intent of the Founders and help ensure that the “consent of the governed” reaches the floor of the Senate, with the voice of minorities included in the debate.


* Promoting Fraternity *

The fiercely adversarial atmosphere that envelops Washington today does not serve the People well.  It stifles compromise, which is the life’s blood of democracy, and it leads to the weaponization of procedural rules, which are intended to lubricate debate and protect the voices of the majority.  It is the direct result of the two-party system, exactly as George Washington predicted.

Comity among those who hold elected office is a prerequisite for a democracy to work.  A Senator should rely on respect from his peers for the office to which he was elected.  He must also recognize that the other Senators were likewise elected, and respect the office of each of them

* Seating on the Senate Floor *

In today’s Senate, the phrase ‘across the aisle’ is more than a metaphor; it is a description of the actual seating arrangement on the Senate floor.  Republicans sit in a monolithic group on the right side of the floor (a historical coincidence, though apt), with an actual aisle separating them from the Democrats on the left.  Such an arrangement ensures that there is no socialization or even discussion on the floor.  All debate is channeled through the leader holding the gavel, chosen by the majority caucus and granted inordinate power to control the course of legislation.

senate seating

To increase the intermingling of lawmakers, seating on the Senate floor could be assigned at random, perhaps weighting the front rows by leadership position and seniority.  Such an arrangement would blur the demarcations between the parties and might eventually result in more meaningful debate.

* Senate Cloakrooms *


Part of a Democratic Cloakroom

Adjacent to the Senate chamber lie the ‘cloakrooms’, which are not what the name implies. explains that Democratic and Republican cloakrooms adjacent to the Senate chamber serve as gathering places for party members to discuss chamber business privately.”  The also contain snack bars, couches, televisions, and private phone.  Only Senators of the designated party, their pages and select staff are admitted.  They are, then, caucus rooms and partisan lounges where lawmakers can go for relaxation and refreshment, or to conduct business, without having to mingle with members of the opposing party or lobbyists.  They are party headquarters located within the Capitol itself, paid for with taxpayers’ money.

The cloakrooms should lose their party designations, becoming rooms that Senators can use regardless of their political affiliations.  As there are two cloakrooms, perhaps one could be designated as political, where members could hash out their differences away from the floor.  The other could be apolitical, where members could just get to know one another, sharing stories of their families, interests, and personal goals, but not the politics of the day.  In both cloakrooms members would be out of sight of the public and the press, but not other members who might disagree with them.

* Party Activity in an Apartisan Senate *

An apartisan Senate would not recognize party affiliation, but it would not forbid it either.  Freedom of speech (freedom of thought) is the second freedom mentioned in Article I, followed closely by the freedom of peaceable assembly.  Assembly for the purpose of establishing a party’s position on a particular bill (caucusing), however, should not take place within the Capitol or even in federal office buildings.

Neither the Vice President nor the President pro tem should participate in such off-campus meetings, even when conducted by their own parties, lest their roles as presiding officers become biased.  Like a judge overseeing a trial, their judgements should be formed based on the issues raised on the floor of the Senate.

* The Constitution and Parliamentary Procedure *

The Constitution does not prescribe the procedures or rules by which the legislate shall operate, instead providing that “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings.”  In consequence, none of the measures described above would require constitutional amendment.  To convince those who presently hold the power to cede it back to the people will probably be an even more Herculean task.  Yet it is one that must necessarily be undertaken for American democracy to survive, and to ensure that, in Lincoln’s powerful words. “government of the people, by the people, and for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

Saving our Elections from Partisanship


, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,



Elections underlie our entire political system.  The founders seem to have intended a vote among the members of an electorate who were educated, informed, and engaged men who would discuss the issues of the day among their peers.   They could be expected to vote according to their personal interests tempered by their patriotic zeal.  Voter participation would be nearly universal.

JeffersonThis ideal soon foundered on the twin shoals of Hamilton’s Federalists and Jefferson’s Democratic Republicans.  In the interest of increasing their voice in politics, individual voters began subordinating their individual votes into blocs.  By the presidency of Andrew Jackson these blocs had solidified into political parties which began, inexorably, to hamiltonincorporate themselves into the very mechanisms of government in ways the framers of the Constitution never envisioned.

Is it possible, at this late date, to extricate ourselves from the situation that we have created over may generations?  I believe it is.  We must begin by taking back our elections from the parties that have a chokehold on them today.


* Open Primaries *

primary ballotToday the primary elections that name the candidates are party operations.  Democrats and Republicans hold separate primary elections in which only registered party members may vote, Republicans participate in in one poll, and Democrats in another.  The winner of each primary face each other in a general election, along with a scattering of lesser party candidates who are usually determined by means other than a primary election.


This system assures that each party has a candidate in the general election, but makes it difficult for independent candidates to prevail.  It poses a diversionary layer between power of the people and the power of the offices themselves.  Leaders or the two major political partiesmany of them unelected,  dominate this layer, with the minor parties exerting a lesser influence, steering elections by sapping votes from one party or the other without actually assuming office.

Open primary elections would remove the parties from the actual execution of elections.  All candidates, without regard to party status or affiliation and subject to the same qualification requirements, would run in a single nationwide primary election administered by a non-partisan election commission.  If the top two vote getters together receive more than half of the votes cast, there need be no further primaries; these will stand against each other in the general election that follows.  If the top two candidates do not together receive a majority, then the highest vote-getters who do receive a half the votes will run again in a multilateral run-off election.  This process will continue as often as necessary, winnowing the field with each primary until one of the candidates, regardless of party affiliation, receive more than half the votes cast.  That majority holder becomes the first nominee for the contested office.

The remaining candidates will stand in a similar runoff process until one of them likewise receives a majority of the votes cast. That winner becomes the second candidate, and the primary process ends.

An additional benefit of this system of open primaries would assure that both nominees would have received a majority of voters in the primary elections, as opposed to the small cadres of party faithful that dominate the process today. 


Steps need to be taken to ensure a high degree of voter participation, so that the majority of votes cast more closely approximate the majority of those eligible to vote, rather than the smaller groups that participate in elections today.  One way to do this might be to make election days into national holidays, and holding them on Saturdays to ameliorate the effects of the extra holidays on national productivity. 

bbqUniform, liberal voter eligibility laws supervised by nonpartisan commissions might increase the accessibility of polls by the people. Eliminating gerrymandering and other forms of voter disenfranchisement is essential.  Making polling places into festive fairs, like Independence Day street fairs, might attract more people and increase voter participation.

In the interest of avoiding voter fatigue and encouraging full participation of the electorate, public electioneering on behalf of individual candidates (including the receipt of campaign contributions) should be limited to the six weeks prior to the first primary election.  Run-off elections should be scheduled at two-week intervals after that.  Open discussions of issues, as opposed to promotion of candidates, would not be so limited.


To offset the bias that occurs when one candidate has access to unlimited cash from wealthy of corporate donors, individual contributions should be limited, and their sources clearly disclosed.  This would ensure that each candidate’s campaign fund was more closely related to the popularity of his or her ideas than the influence of wealthy special interests. 

money cartoon

Contributions by corporations should be prohibited, since they allow owners to contribute multiple times, once for each corporation owned.  This unfairly weights contributions, and possibly influence, in favor of the wealthy.  The Citizen’s United decision should be rescinded, and the very concept of corporate personhood should be reexamined.  Public funding of elections, at least at the primary level, should be considered.


In elections for federal office, these rules should apply to all national and statewide elections in a uniform fashion.  District elections to the House of Representatives could proceed in a similar fashion.  If such a system proved successful, elections for statewide offices, such as governors and attorneys general, might follow a similar process, piggybacked on the statewide ballots for national office.

The Constitution specifies that the states will administer elections, including those for federal office, but does allow for the federal government to ensure that states adhere to Constitutional requirements.  The changes I have outlined here, which would result in more uniform election procedures across the United States, might require Constitutional Amendment.



Smoke & Mirrors

mueller report2

The Trump Administration’s actions at the southern border are grotesque and dehumanizing.  There seems to be open contempt for the rule of law and for basic human decency…

…The Trump Administration has demonstrated repeatedly that it is willing to disregard the Constitution, defy decades of clear precedent, and invent frivolous new arguments to delay and obstruct Congress’ oversight authority.  Attorney General Barr and Secretary Ross are complicit in this cover-up…refusing to comply with duly authorized subpoenas from Congress.

…Mr. Chairman, we need you.  Those children need you.  I am talking directly to my Republican colleagues.  We need you to stand up to President Trump.  We need yu to join us in telling him that we reject this mean policy…

It is time for Congress to start conducting its own independent and credible oversight of the White House from scrutiny.

…We should be able to agree that we will not keep kids in child internment camps indefinitely and hidden away from public view.  What country is that?  This is The United States of America!

–Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Maryland

COULROPHOBIA:Reality TV Roadshow

clown king fans

I posted this image on Flickr, and called it COULROPHOBIA: Reality TV Roadshow.  The first comment appeared almost at once:

Not funny. No place for hatred and intolerance on Flickr. This is an art and photography community, Not a political platform.

At first I was aghast. A complex mixed reaction swept over me, compounded of anger at accusation of hate, and regret for having caused her distress, tinged with feelings that were admittedly political and inappropriate.  It unsettled me.  Here is my response:

I agree with you that this is not funny. That is why I called it coulrophobia, fear of clowns. I disagree that it is not art.

Art and politics are not self-exclusive. Consider Picasso’s Guernica or Brecht’s Threepenny Opera.

 I am distressed with some of the ways our democracy is trending, and that distress finds its way into some of my images. It may not be politically correct, but it is honest and straight from the heart, as art must be,

In the cool light of morning, I have had time to think about this.  The issues I have struggled with are threefold.  Is this image hateful?  What is the relationship between art and politics?  What is the relationship between truth, free expression, and art?

enchanted forest 72dpi**

I do not like to think of myself as hateful, but I admit there is hate in me.  In general, I hate acts, not people.  I do not care about a person’s skin color, ethnicity, of gender identity. When a shooting occurs in the inner city I don’t need to know if it was black-on-black or white on black to deplore the shooting itself.  I respect the Muslim faith, but I hate murder in the name of Allah.  I am incorrigibly straight, but I hate the idea that anyone else can tell me, or any other human being, whom to love.

children's jail1I do not hate Donald Trump.  I do not even hate his policies, although I disagree with most of them.  I do hate the separation of children from their parents for political gain.  I hat the imprisonment of children without due process, for the crime of wanting to stay with their parents when they tried to cross the border into America.  I hate the kissing up to vile autocrats in Russia, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia for the sake of American (and personal) business interests.  I hate to see my country putting the interests of dying industries, like fossil fuels and steel, above the interests of a dying planet.  I hate the nepotism.  I hate the lies.  I do not hate Donald Trump.

It fact, there are parts of the Trump agenda I agree with, in principle if not in implementation. The tangle of red tape that has resulted from Congress’ abdication of its legislative function to the Executive branch, and the jungle of expensive administrative agencies that has engendered, desperately needs to be cut back.  Previous administrations have tried to do this, and largely failed.  Trump is succeeding, but without any finesse, or heed to the damage he is doing.  I like the end, but I hate the means.  When you hire the bull to clean out the china closet, you may not be happy with the results.

detention layer lo resMy Trump images try to cleave to real events.  When Trump steps up to the podium at one of his rallies, he reverts in my perception to a clownish constructed persona.  When he slides into one of his cute but slanderous little skits attacking journalists and women, an adoring crowd cheers his performance and warm to the affirmation of their own beliefs.  This is performance art, not leadership.

No, this image was not born of hate, but of dread.  Coulrophobia.


Does art have a place for politics?  Of course it does. 


Delacroix-Liberty Leading the People

Aristophanes comedy Lysistrata, in which the women of Greece try to end the Peloponnesian War by withholding sex from all Greek men until they end it, appeared in 411 BCE.  Much art of the Renaissance was an extended paean to the Church, which at the time was as political as it was theologically. In 1830, French master Eugene Delacroix presented Liberty Leading the People to the Paris Salon.   At the turn of the 20th century, the fierce battle between the Salonists and the Refusés was settled by Napoléon III—modern art began with an Imperial decree.  As the 20ty century wore on, Lenin, Goebbels, and their ilk, made propaganda science.  Art entered the service of the state, though one can argue whether Social Realism is really art.

G.W.Bellows-Ashcan School

G.W.Bellows-Ashcan School

In America, newly minted Impressionist began to turn their attention to urban themes, with a gritty reality that became as the Ashcan school.   Franklin Roosevelt experimented with state sponsored art with the Public Works Art Project (PWAP) and its well-known successor, the Works Progress Administration (WPA)  Norman Rockwell shifted during World War II from homey Americana to strongly felt political imagery, beginning with Four Freedoms and processing through The Problem We All Live With, which portrays a young black girl in a fine white dress and carrying schoolbooks, flanked by federal marshals as she walks by a wall marred with racist graffiti  and stained with thrown tomatoes, as she walks to her first day at a newly integrated school in New Orleans. For many (including me), that was when Rockwell rose from being a clever illustrator to being a profound artist.


Jakob Riis-Bandits’ Roost

Flickr, especially in the Smug Mug era, is devoted to photography.  Because of its inherent documentary property, photography has always welcomed political art.  Matthew Brady’s battlefield images affected Lincoln, and the course of the Civil War.  Jakob Riis’ pictures in The Way the Other Half Lives profoundly affected Theodore Roosevelt, helping to usher in the Progressive Era.  The Depression portfolio of Dorothea Lange and Gordon Parks’ documentary work in the black ghetto of the 50s through the 70s carry potent political power.

My art does not rise to the level of these greats. It is not disqualified as being art, however, simply because it has political content.


“Beauty is truth, and truth beauty,“—that is all

ye know on Earth, and all ye need to know.”

John Keats, Ode on a Grecian Urn

This is a quaint Victorian conceit, comfortable in its naiveté, but it is not true.  Truth is not always beautiful.  It is true, though, that what is not true is seldom art.

This does not mean that art must cleave to the laws of physics or the universe of facts.  The truth of art is more profound than that. No one believes that The Wizard of Oz is an historical document.  The truths that it tells about courage, intelligence, and heart, about the powers of persistence and love, and the battle between good and evil, all resonate with us.  These deeper truths are the basis of its art.

off to see the wizard st basils

My picture is not factual, but it is true to the feeling I get when I see clips of a Trump rally.  I do not believe that I am the only one who sees it this way.  It is not a beautiful image, but it is earnest and honest.  The picture is not funny.  It evokes a pang of truth that is unsettling.  If it draws out a chuckle, it is not from amusement but from that most dissonant of feelings: irony.

dangerous toyI regret any distress I have provoked.  I regret the loss of comity in our shared country, making it difficult today to hold sharply differing opinions without harboring ill feeling, and digging in.  I regret that we cannot move our country out of the terrible mire we have driven into, because we have lost track of the highway of facts that could lead us through the jungle of unproven assertions.  We have allowed our ability to compromise to atrophy to near uselessness.  We have allowed our need to win no matter what to outstrip our need to do the right thing for our country.

I do not regret my image.  It is not great art, but it is art nonetheless.

Lord What Fools These Mortals Be

shark tee

People never cease to amaze me.

When I first arrived on Cape Cod, I went for a walk on the beach despite a brewing storm. There I watched a man bring his young family out to the end of a stone jetty, dragging beach chairs. They wanted the best view of the storm surge as it rolled in on the high tide, ahead of Hurricane Floyd. They appeared to have no awareness of the risks they were taking. Floyd fizzled here; I believe they survived, but I can’t be sure. God looks after idiots and drunks.

Recently the presence of great white sharks off Cape Cod has grown in the public’s awareness. The sharks are drawn here, perhaps by warmer summer ocean temperatures, and certainly by the smorgasbord of seals laid out on the beaches and sandbars from Monomoy to Race Point.

Tourists are drawn to these very beaches, in the hopes of sighting a shark. While they wait for a dorsal fin to appear (with the brain-worm shark theme from Jaws doubtless harmonizing with the sounds of the surf in their benumbed brains), they swim, surf and splash in the very waters where giant, unseen predators prowl for their pinneped prey.

Shark attacks of humans on Cape Cod have been rare. Between 1965 and 2014, only four such attacks were reported, none of them fatal. The last fatal shark attack on the Cape occurred in 1936.

Entertainments like the Jaws and Sharknado franchises trivialize a real peril, and titillate with a faux fear that is fun to feel. On Cape Cod, the thrill is so much more fun for being real. Tourism at the Cape Cod National Seashore spikes during Discovery Channel’s Shark Week.

This year, there have been two horrific shark attacks here. A New York man was maimed in Truro, but survived. A Revere man died of shark-inflicted injuries in Wellfleet.

For those tourists who insist on unrestricted ocean swimming here still, I have designed the tee shirt graphic above. I mean no disrespect for those who have already suffered grievous harm. I do mean disrespect the the hoards of those who willfully ignore their sacrifice, and especially to those in the entertainment and tourist trades who have commercialized it.

The shirt is specifically designed to be used as a tourniquet, if necessary.

LeCount Hollow shark short header

Homeland Security?


, , , ,

detention layer lo res

“I didn’t like the sight or the feeling of families being separated,” Trump told reporters, with Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and Vice-President Mike Pence standing by his side. “I think anybody with a heart would feel strongly about it. We don’t like to see families separated.”

It’s not that he doesn’t like the fact of the child abductions he has ordered, mind you.  It’s that he doesn’t like “the sight or the feel” of it.  He doesn’t like seeing it on TV. 

Sometimes the language Trump uses, inadvertently or not, shows a flickering glimpse into that dark vacuum where his soul should be.

His use here of the passive voice, and the conditional perfect form of the verb ‘to feel’, is interesting.  It allows him to invoke the warm and fuzzy feelings associated with people with hearts and caring about children, without actually committing himself to either one.  Then there’s his use of the Imperial We…

Consider this sentence instead: “I don’t like separating families.” It is a strong sentence, clear and declarative, but it has two major problems for Trump.  With its active voice and simple present tense, it takes ownership of the worst aspect of the policy, and it renders the lie transparent–his glee with the chaos he produces shines through his habitual melancholy bluster.  He would prefer us to admire the strength of his border policies, once again conflating cruelty with strength at the expense of empathy.  That is the core of the Trump political brand.

Secretary Nielsen displays a similar lack commitment to empathy in her remarks:

“… the children in D.H.S. and H.H.S. custody are being well taken care of.”  she insisted.  “The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement provides meals, medical care and educational services to these children. They are provided temporary shelter, and H.H.S. works hard to find a parent, relative or foster home to care for these children.”

She clearly has a better command of the organizational chart of the Executive Branch than of the urgent needs of a traumatized child, or even how to comfort a crying baby.  She knows who the boss is.  She can be lawyerly, but can she be motherly?

Apparently the Secretary believes that providing pizza and indoor cages with Mylar blankets, along with medical care for physical problems (which probably doesn’t even satisfy the Geneva Convention for adult prisoners of war) constitutes good care for child political prisoners.  Does she seriously think that children, after a strenuous trek through tropical jungles, arid deserts, and hostile countryside, witnessing violence and death, and then, with the goal in sight, being snatched from their parents in a strange land whose language and customs they do not understand, and held like animals in locked cages, are ready for packaged “educational services’, or won’t act out their anger when they are placed, all alone, in the homes of strangers who speak a language foreign to them?

The last months have provided even the youngest of them with an education beyond what their keepers can even comprehend, bilingual or not. 

Still, taken out of contest, it all sounds so humane

POTUS hates immigrants whenever they come;
They are dirty and violent, worthless and dumb.
He hates South Americans most for their treasons.
Now please don’t ask why. He won't give us his reasons.
It could be his head isn’t screwed on just right.
It could be, perhaps, that his shoes are too tight.
But I think that the most likely reason of all
May just be that his heart is two sizes too small.

(Forgive me, Dr, Seuss!  I got carried away.
And I still don’t feel  better, I’m sorry to say.)

** *** **


The photo underlying this was taken by Gerald L. Nino (irony, anyone?) of the US Border Patrol.  It shows Mexicans awaiting deportation.  DHS released it in 2011, when Barak Obama was president.  Donald Trump did not invent this problem, but he seems to be perfecting it.

A Great Fall


, , , , , , ,

a great fall3

All the King’s horses and all the King’s men could not put Humpty together again. 

Humpty Dumpty has been used to demonstrate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The law describes a property of things known as entropy, which is a measure of the number of specific ways in which a system may be arranged. Entropy represents the energy in a thermodynamic system which is not available to do work. It is often taken to be a measure of  randomness or disorder:  the higher the entropy, the more chaotic is the system, and the less useful energy it contains. 

After his fall and subsequent shattering, Humpty becomes a high entropy (disordered) system. The inability to put him together again illustrates the Second Law, as it would be extremely difficult (though not impossible) to return him to his earlier state of lower entropy (higher orderliness) without enormous effort. The entropy of an isolated system never decreases on its own. (A deck of cards cannot become a house of cards without inputs of energy.)

 Unlike that better known systems property, mass/energy, which cannot be created or destroyed, new entropy is constantly created. Perhaps to accommodate its growing chaos, the universe is eternally expanding.



Doctor in Brooklyn: Why are you depressed, Alvy?

Alvy’s Mom: Tell Dr. Flickr. [turns to doctor]…its something he read.

Doctor in Brooklyn: Something he read, huh?

Alvy at 9: The universe is expanding.

Doctor in Brooklyn: The universe is expanding?

Alvy at 9: Well, the universe is everything, and if it’s expanding, someday it will break apart and that would be the end of everything!

Alvy’s Mom: Why is that your business? [turns to doctor] He stopped doing his homework!

Alvy at 9: What’s the point?

Alvy’s Mom: What has the universe got to do with it? You’re here in Brooklyn! Brooklyn is not expanding!

Doctor in Brooklyn: It won’t be expanding for billions of years yet, Alvy. And we’ve gotta try to enjoy ourselves while we’re here! 

–Woody Allen, Annie Hall



, , , , ,


Michaelangelo: detail of Judgement Day panel, Sistine Chapel



In the short cold days each year

There is  a dark forbidding room

Where shades in darkness whisper fear

And only my discerning ear

Perceives the wail of coming doom


Wraiths about me natter on

About the lengthening of days

And all the myriad of ways

To knuckle down and battle on

Until the warmth of summer stays


Far away I hear birds singing

In the distance there is light

Time they say is surely bringing

White doves with a new beginning

That will end this bitter night


I cannot get from here to there

All that is too far away

Where I am there is just despair

I am no longer welcome where

The things I’ve loved have gone to stay


A true companion and old friend

Deeper in the darkness lies

Who’ll use the dark itself to send

A surer pathway the end

My final consolation prize


Slender Man: alternative realities


, , , , , , , ,

enchanted forest 72dpi

By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes!

The enchanted world of Donald Trump. Unless you are a billionaire, you are paying dearly for it, no matter where in the world you live. Given his postures on science and war, the final cost may be our shared world itself, now that he is the boss.  Our children have the most to fear.

All that glitters is not gold. All movement is not forward. All change is not progress. In our world of relentless hyperpartisanship, manipulated social media, and aggressive commercial and financial exploitation of those not already obscenely wealthy, common sense grows increasingly rare.

“This is not okay,” says Jim Comey; here, at least, he is correct. If we let it become normal, we will have lost.

Whidah Maker

The Legend of Goody Hallett

goody hallett2

Mary (or Maria, or Mariah) Hallet lived in Eastham in the late 1600’s and early 1700’s. She went by the given name “Goody”. Records from 17th century America are sparse, so little is known about Goody Hallett from a historical perspective. The legend is emphatic on one point, though: young Mary was a very attractive blond.

She was just 15 or 16 when she met the pirate “Black Sam” Bellamy, who plundered the ships plying Cape Cod waters. Mary fell in love with Sam. For a time, it seemed like a classic story of forbidden love, the village beauty and the dashing privateer.

But Sam, the blackguard, sailed away, promising the maiden he would return to wed once his fortune had been made. Years passed. Bellamy, a brilliant naval tactician and charismatic leader of men, became the most successful of the Caribbean buccaners, but Black Sam never returned alive to Goody, or Cape Cod.

Sam had left Mary with child. She hid her pregnancy, and when the baby came, she smothered it.. When the villagers of Eastham learned of her foul deed, they shunned her. She was exiled to neighboring Wellfleet.

Mary Hallet became a recluse. She lived alone in a small shack in Wellfleet, hidden among the dunes in an area which is still known as Goody Hallet Meadow. Some say it was there that she sold her soul to the Devil.

The villagers believed she was a witch. God-fearing Puritans were forbidden to speak to her. She grew wan and haggard. Some say she was pining away for Sam Bellamy, while some say she was just biding her time, scheming her revenge.

In April 1717 Black Sam Bellamy returned to Eastham with his newly stolen ship, the Whydah, a swift and heavily armored galley designed as a slaver. When he arrived at the Cape a great nor’easter arose without warning. The Whidah foundered off the coast of Wellfleet. The entire crew was lost, including Black Sam.

The night of the storm the villagers saw Mary Hallet standing on the bluffs, waving her hands, casting curses into the angry sky. Apparently she had summoned the storm to kill Sam.

Sam’s body was never recovered from the wreck. Some say he and Goody escaped the tempest, and lived together in anonymity, rich and happy, passing Black Sam’s mantle to his protogé, Edward “Blackbeard” Teach. Others say that Mary recovered Sam’s treasure from the wreck of the Whydah, and buried it somewhere in Wellfleet, where it remains undiscovered to this day.

The villagers were so horrified by what they had seen Mary doing in the storm that they chased her into White Cedar Swamp, where i they presumed she died. Perhaps she did.

Mary Hallet’s ghost is said still to wander the dunes overlooking Nantucket Sound, in areas known today by many dark names, like Lucifer’s Land and Devil’s Pasture.

When a nor’easter blows in today, listeners on the bluff can hear the plaintive and angry wails of Goody Hallett as the wind grows cold before the storm.

*** ** ***


The wreck of the Whidah was discovered in 1984 by adventurer Barry Clifford, and artifacts from her, as well as from other pirates and the Caribbean slave trade, can be seen at the Whidah Pirate Museum in South Yarmouth, MA.

Nearby Clifford believes he has found the Whidah’s fabled treasure trove, concealed for centuries beneath shifting underwater sands.

Most extraordinary of all, from a concretion within the sunken galley Clifford’s team has extracted a human femur which may be the remains of Black Sam Bellamy himself. Descendants of Black Sam have been located in the UK, and DNA tests are pending.  Stay tuned.

Of Goody Hallett naught remains but the haunting legend, and the eerie, cold wail of the freshening northeasterly breeze that heralds stormy weather on Cape Cod.

Link to ColdBrook e-Gallery